Downtime is well understood in mineral processing operations.
Most US concentrators have mature downtime classification, reporting, and review processes. Stops are captured, categorized, and discussed in detail. They feature prominently in daily production meetings and monthly performance reviews because they are unambiguous: when the plant is down, tons stop.
What receives far less scrutiny are production opportunity losses – periods where the plant is running, but consistently below achievable throughput, recovery, or product quality.
In many operations, these production opportunity losses can quietly erode more value than discrete downtime events. They persist shift after shift, often without triggering alarms or escalation, and gradually become accepted as “normal” operation.
Downtime versus production opportunity loss
From a metallurgical performance perspective, downtime and production opportunity losses are simply different expressions of the same problem: lost potential value.
The difference is visibility.
Downtime is binary – either running or stopped.
Opportunity losses are continuous, running, but below what’s achievable.
A one-day outage attracts immediate attention.
Running a few per cent below achievable feed rate, recovery or product quality for short periods over a shift, week in and week out, often does not – even though the total loss can be similar.
That’s why production opportunity losses are damaging; they rarely feel urgent, yet they can accumulate to erode significant value.
What are production opportunity losses?
In practice, an opportunity loss can be defined as:
Operation below achievable or constraint-aligned throughput, recovery or grade without being captured as a downtime event.
That definition deliberately avoids relying on a single “target” because most mineral processing plants operate with multiple reference points:
- Design target – nameplate capacity
- Budget target – planning assumption
- Best demonstrated – proven capability under comparable conditions
- Constraint-based – what the bottleneck unit/s can sustain
Production opportunity losses occur when the operation consistently sits below the achievable envelope for the prevailing ore type, blend, and circuit configuration.
Common sources of opportunity losses
Opportunity losses in base metals concentrators typically appear in:
Grinding circuits
Mills intentionally capped below constraint because of bearing temperatures, sump level variability, cyclone pressure excursions, or perceived instability near limits.
Flotation circuits
Mass pull constrained by conservative air rates, froth depth, or reagent dosing to avoid short-term instability at the expense of sustained throughput.
Importantly, this is not a people issue. It is a systems and visibility issue. If production opportunity losses are not clearly visible or quantified, they cannot compete for attention against more obvious failures.
Common sources of opportunity losses
Most operations do not deliberately ignore opportunity losses deliberately. The challenge is that opportunity losses are inherently harder to define and capture than downtime.
Several barriers are common across US concentrators:
Process variability and ore complexity
Variable feed characteristics make operators hesitant to define a clear “expected” rate.
Undefined operating envelopes
Without a clearly agreed-upon throughput, recovery, and product quality window, underperformance is difficult to objectively classify.
Insufficient instrumentation
The lack of on-stream assay and/or grind-size analyzers means operating parameters cannot be optimized in real time.
Operator risk management
Crews naturally avoid pushing the plant when there are known issues (i.e. mechanical or control). This keeps the plant running but at a lower performance, hiding the true constraint and making these opportunity losses hard to recognize and track.
Legacy systems
Older purpose-built systems are designed to classify plant stoppages and maybe slowdowns, not to detect and quantify underperformance in recovery and product quality.
Reporting cadence
Monthly averages smooth out hourly and shift-level losses, obscuring the real drivers.
The true cost: throughput, recovery and quality impacts
A key reason opportunity losses are underestimated is that their impact is distributed over time.
Consider a plant operating a few per cent below achievable throughput for distinct periods over several days. There is no single event to point to, no “failure”, and often no escalation.
Yet, when added up over time, the lost metal output can rival or exceed the impact of a major downtime incident.
From a production opportunity loss perspective:
- Downtime is a one-off event.
- Opportunity losses are persistent.
Persistent losses almost always dominate the long-term metal output gap.
What drives persistent underperformance
In most mineral processing plants, opportunity losses are not caused by one catastrophic issue. They emerge from interacting technical and organisational factors, including:
Operating philosophy
- Conservatively defined targets that drift downward over time
- Stability prioritized without periodic reassessment of achievable limits
Mechanical and control limitations
- Poorly tuned control loops that become unstable near constraints
- Constraint protection logic that is never revisited post commissioning
- Instrument degradation is quietly forcing conservative operation
Feed management and sequencing
- Blend transitions handled with excessive margin
- Reclaim or feed sequencing decisions that amplify variability upstream of the constraint
Asset degradation without failure
- Liner wear, pump inefficiency, valve stiction
- Equipment that “still runs” but at a steadily declining performance level
Human factors
- Operators defaulting to low-risk modes
- Manual intervention is becoming normalized
- Reduced urgency because the plant remains available
None of these is clearly visible if plant performance discussions are framed solely around downtime attributed to equipment failure.
How to make opportunity losses visible
Production opportunity losses tend to hide because most operations lack mechanisms to make them feel like events.
Downtime is visible and has an obvious structure:
- Start time
- End time
- Classification
- Accountability
Opportunity losses are not always visible and obvious.
Instead, they are masked by:
- KPIs focused on availability rather than effective metal output
- Monthly or weekly averaging that obscures shift-level losses
- Baselines that are set too conservatively to reveal underperformance‑performance
As a result, many sites pursue capital projects before fully exhausting the operational headroom already in place within the plant.
Making production opportunity loss visible: the real unlock
Recovering lost metal output does not begin with “running harder”. It begins with clearly and consistently seeing opportunity losses.
Practically, this involves three shifts:
- Define operating windows, not a single number
Achievable metal output should be expressed as a range that reflects:
- Ore type and blend
- Circuit configuration
- Known constraints
This creates a reference frame for identifying genuine underperformance rather than normal variability.
- Treat opportunity losses as events
Event-based tracking enables:
- Start and end times
- Classification of causes
- Separation of planned versus unplanned opportunity losses
- Time-weighted production impact‑weighted production impact
This reframes opportunity losses as something observable and actionable.
- Reduce the burden on operators
If capturing opportunity losses requires manual effort or subjective judgment, consistency will suffer.
Modern approaches focus on real-time visibility, automatic detection of deviations, and structured classification that supports, not distracts, the front-line team.
Real-time use case: detecting losses during a shift
Consider a typical shift in a US copper concentrator.
The plant remains available. No major alarms are active. Yet the recovery trend begins to sag several hours into the shift.
Traditionally, this underperformance may not be addressed until the end-of-shift report, by which time the opportunity loss is unrecoverable.
With real-time visibility into production opportunity loss events, supervisors can see:
- When under‑performance begins
- Which area of the circuit is contributing
- Whether the pattern matches previous events
Rather than waiting for production meetings, the team can respond while mitigation and countermeasures are still possible.
This is where tools within the MPA software suite, such as Production Monitor, play a supporting role, providing instant visibility into all production loss events, including downtime, throughput, recovery and product quality. Even consumable tracking is possible if needed.
The value is not automation for its own sake, but shared, timely awareness that enables better metallurgical and operational decisions during the shift.
What changes once production opportunity losses are visible?
When opportunity losses are tracked with the same discipline as downtime, several benefits emerge:
- Business improvement efforts focus on real constraints, not symptoms
- Operators gain confidence to operate closer to proven limits
- APC and control tuning targets stabilize the circuit near the constraint, not average performance
- Maintenance prioritisation improves, supported by quantified metal output impact
- Metal output increases without capital investment, simply by recovering persistent losses
In many plants, this represents the largest untapped opportunity for near-term production uplift.
Downtime will always matter. But it is only part of the metal output story.
Plants that consistently meet targets are not just good at recovering from stops; they are also good at avoiding them.
Because the most damaging losses are rarely the loudest.
If you’re ready to start making production opportunity losses visible, without increasing operator workload, explore how Production Monitor fits into the MPA suite and how it supports real-time visibility into production loss events and deviations
FAQs about production opportunity losses in mineral processing
1. What are production opportunity losses in mineral processing?
2. Why are opportunity losses more damaging than downtime?
3. How can plants detect opportunity losses in real time?
4. How does Production Monitor support opportunity loss recovery?
5. What is the business value of reducing opportunity losses?
Read more insights into software in mineral processing
Downtime is visible. Opportunity losses are not.
Production opportunity losses occur when a plant is running but consistently below achievable throughput, recovery…
Stay up to date with the latest MPA product updates
Built to adapt, designed to perform With every update, MPA enhances how minerals processing operations…
What’s your Golden State? Defining operational excellence with MPA
In 2026, operational excellence means clarity, alignment, and confidence. Learn how Golden State helps mineral…